Update 1: December 28, 5:15 pm:
I have received a note pointing out that a second entrance program is in progress for various stations regardless of the building code requirement for a “trigger” condition (the addition of substantial load to the demand in the station).
The reports in question are from 2004 and 2005. The 2005 report deals with College, Wellesley, Museum and Castle Frank. The work at Castle Frank is underway now. Museum was to get a second exit through the vent shaft at the south end of the station, but this work was put on hold because it was to be funded as part of the condo project on the Planetarium site that was cancalled.
Original post follows with amendments:
“James” sent in a comment in the Richmond Hill subway thread that deserves to start a discussion of its own.
Perhaps this comment belongs back in your thread on Bloor-Yonge renovations….
But since that seems to be the dominant line of discussion here….
Your arguments are persuasive on the need to build a DRL (something I already supported); but further, to build it prior to either a major Yonge line extension, or a massive Bloor-Yonge overhaul.
However, I think everyone can accept that Bloor-Yonge, as it is today, requires more space, and improved passenger flows just to cope with existing traffic; and it will likely need that even if a DRL is built. Though, one hopes a less drastic solution might be feasible.
Which brings me to the Steve question of the day. Given the need for capacity/flow improvements and for the renovation for aesthetic and state-of-good-repair reasons of the Yonge portion of Bloor-Yonge…. What if any improvements could the TTC make to this station that would be of moderate expense, and less disruption, in the immediate future?
This post deals primarily with the south end of the Yonge line, but the topic is a generic one for both existing and future stations: providing the ability for passengers to move around within the stations. Stations exist to move people, not just trains. Continue reading