One of my regular correspondents, David Crawford, passed on this post on the torontoist blog about the disappearing escalator signs.
For a group of people who can’t find time to put up clear and current signage (lots of examples on your site) I find it amazing they can find time and man-power to remove signs that seem, to me anyway, as being very useful. They have them in London where the escalators are very orderly, they do not have them in Montreal, where it’s chaotic – draw your own conclusions!)
From my point of view, the most walking that happens on escalators is at times when they are not running at all. This has not been as bad of late as the months I documented earlier in 2006, but it still happens far too often.
As for claims that an escalator cannot be restarted without an extensive technical check, here’s a counter example. A few days ago, at Broadview Station, the oft-stopped escalator was restarted by someone who just arrived on the scene, inserted a key to start it, and then wandered off again. So much for a complex inspection, just another of those wonderful TTC excuses for not providing good service.
There’s a great article on spacing’s website by Bob Brent about the TTC Timeline system.
Click here to read it.
Mark Dowling sent in the following note in response to the item on Park Lawn Loop:
Where do you stand on a Queensway ROW west of Humber Loop? I know ridership on 80 is dismal but so is the service. The street is wide and to my mind screams for LRVs or Citadis 302s bombing along between Roncesvalles and Sherway at 2x bus stop lengths with all the toys – next-car displays, signal priority and the like – giving a real “subway-like” service as opposed to the joke our Mayor cracked in relation to St Clair.
The residential developments at Sherway and along the Queensway would, I believe, generate a decent ridership if decent service was offered. Who knows, it might even pull in some park and ride traffic from the Gardiner?
Steve: First off, The Queensway as far as Kipling is an “Avenue” in the Official Plan, and it is also shown as a Transit Priority corridor all the way to Brown’s Line (as is Lake Shore). You would never know this from the sort of service offered in that part of the world or the total absence of planning for improvements as part of the TTC’s LRT studies.
Southern Etobicoke has a huge amount of redevelopable land — old industrial property, strip malls, parking lots — and there are also big possibilities up at the Six Points. However, if we keep pumping out the message that this part of the world won’t be developed soon, if ever, from our own Planning Department, transit will continue to ignore this part of the world as well.
To answer your question, yes, an LRT service along The Queensway would be a great addition to the network, assuming redevelopment to support it.
What effect this would have on the Gardiner is another matter. I think that the car traffic comes from further afield in the 905, and the benefit of new transit services will be to allow growth in population without overwhelming the road system. However, we must have the will to “invest” in the future of this part of the city just as we hope to do in the eastern waterfront.