This perennial issue never goes away, at least not on my site. Continue reading
Subways
Waterfront East and Scarborough RT Updates
The draft Terms of Reference for the Environmental Assessment of the eastern waterfront transit plans goes to the TTC for approval next Wednesday.
This draft is the product by much work in full public meetings as well as a community consultation group. I must commend the team who worked on the draft for their openness to changes, expansion in scope and generally inclusive approach. The stage of building a ToR can be extremely tedious, but it is vital to ensure that all of the alternatives are considered in the EA itself. This is a refreshing change from the St. Clair project.
Assuming that the TTC approves the draft, it will go to the Ministry of the Environment for review over the next few months. While that is underway, some preliminary work will continue collecting information needed for the study and also presenting some technical workshops so that the community can better understand the work behind transportation planning and design.
Meanwhile, the Scarborough RT study is not included on this week’s TTC agenda although it was originally planned for a June presentation. I suspect that recent events at the TTC coupled with the relatively tighter timelines on the Waterfront studies have pushed the SRT report off into the summer.
Everything Old Is New Again
My friend Ed Drass just sent me a puff piece from the Greater Toronto Airports Authority (GTAA) about the impending opening of their new inter-terminal shuttle. Read all about it here. [This link is no longer active.]
What amuses me immensely is the propulsion technology. The cars are pulled along by a “rope” to which they are attached. There is only one unit on each of two tracks and so collisions are impossible.
We technically savvy railfan types will recognize this as a blend of elevator and cablecar technology. Just think of the tourism potential if they hadn’t built an automated system! In my mind’s eye, I see GTAA staff, in a period conductor’s uniform with the title “gripman” (or maybe “gripperson” to be more 21st century about it). The cars could have lovely wooden trim, bench seats, and running-boards for the adventurous riders.
Might be a bit chilly for those interterminal transfers in February, but maybe we could have a summer and a winter fleet.
Hmmm … this sounds like the sort of high-tech transit the Urban Transportation Development Corporation would lap up. A new world-beating technology! Just in time to replace the Scarborough RT!
[We will return to our regular, curmudgeonly programming later this week with a look at next Wednesday’s TTC meeting.]
The Spadina Subway: The Elephant in the Room
Today, the CBC reported that Ontario’s Minister of Finance says that the Spadina Subway extension will go ahead whether the Feds contribute any money or not. This could be read partly as wishful thinking along the lines of “Harper will be gone before we actually have to pay for it”, but there’s another darker implication. Continue reading
Christoper Hume and Jeff Gray Write About Transit
The Sunday Star had an article by Christopher Hume called The Error of Our Subways.
While the rest of the world embraced the importance of transit, Toronto wasted time and money on momuments to egotistical politicians and technology boondoggles.
There are a few glitches in Hume’s article, but it’s good to see this whole debate getting an airing. If we are going to spend money on transit, let’s spend it in the right place.
Meanwhile, Jeff Gray writing in today’s Globe reports that the number crunchers at Queen’s Park have combed through recent Federal Budget papers, and have found not one penny to pay for the Spadina subway extension to York University.
How long will it take for someone at Queen’s Park to wake up to the fact that they could build a really great LRT network focussed on York U with the $1.3-billion represented by the provincial and municipal shares of the Spadina subway proposal?
The fact that York U and their supporters have wasted so much time and effort on a subway proposal shows how badly understood the real alternatives are. That’s the legacy of those wasted decades and the thinking that brought us the Sheppard subway.
I remember former mega-mayor Mel Lastman saying that “real cities don’t use streetcars”. Sorry Mel, but real cities built transit systems while Toronto argued where to put a few miles of track.
Can Dalton McGuinty and David Miller save us from this folly? Do we have to wait until both are safely re-elected before we start considering alternatives?
Reader Comments About the RT and Subways (Updated)
A batch of reader comments on the technology debates. Continue reading
Reader Letters: Calgary and Scarborough LRT
More letters from readers. I’m posting Scarborough RT feedbacks in a separate thread now because the original one was getting rather long. Continue reading
The Scarborough RT, LRT Plans and a Star Editorial
Today’s Toronto Star contains an editorial endorsing the use of LRT as the technology to replace the existing RT. Here is the full text [I am posting it here as it will disappear from the paper’s website in a week or so]. Continue reading
Reader Comments: A Mixed Bag For the End of April
The responses to the RT issue have kept me busy, and now it’s time to deal with the backlog of mail again. Continue reading
From the Archives: The Scarborough LRT — What Might Have Been
Back in April 1977, the TTC and the Metro Toronto Planning Department produced a feasibility study for a Scarborough LRT line. I’m not going into all of the details as it’s too sad to contemplate the missed opportunity. Queen’s Park wanted to show off their toy trains, and the chance for a suburban transit network was lost for decades, maybe forever.
Here’s just a taste.