The new 29 Dufferin service described below was approved without debate at the TTC meeting on January 31. Like some who have commented on this post, I look forward to the creative writing in the six-month review of the trial service. It’s good to know that influential members of Council can get service to a location with zero demand while people are freezing in the cold from inadequate service. Maybe the Councillor will champion significant additional funding for TTC operations in this year’s budget. We shall see.
Here’s the original post:
Last September, at the urging of Deputy Mayor Pantalone, the TTC approved the extension of the 29 Dufferin bus through the CNE to serve the new BMO Field soccer stadium. This will not just be a special event service, but an all-day operation. Every second bus will run south from Dufferin Loop, across the top of the CNE grounds via Saskatchewan Road and Manitoba Drive (past the existing streetcar loop) to a loop just north of Princes’ Gate.
It should be noted that the Dufferin bus will not pass much closer to the new stadium than the existing streetcar service, and Ontario Place will still be a healthy hike from any transit service.
This wouldn’t be news to anyone except for one thing: the estimated annual cost will be $350K, but this will be offset by reallocating service from the existing Dufferin route or from other parts of the system. One or two additional buses will be required at all times of the day, and as we well know, there’s nothing to spare elsewhere in the system.
Try telling this to the residents of northeastern Scarborough who, after a deputation at the TTC last year, were told that the earliest they could get more service, or in some cases any service, would be September 2007 when Mayor Miller’s 100 new buses will start rolling into town.
I suppose that if we built the soccer stadium in Scarborough, we would already be extending the RT to serve it day and night whether anyone was actually there or not.
I have no problem with serving special events at the CNE grounds, regardless of where they are located or what market they serve. When we start taking service away from the existing system during peak periods for a new full-time service, a line has been crossed.
The list of routes where service is inadequate but where improvement is thwarted by a combination of fleet size, available operators, and the pig-headedness of the City Budget process, is very, very long. When one Councillor gets service reallocated to serve his pet project, that’s an abuse of the transit system.
This proposal should be scrapped.