Line 6 Finch West opened for service on Sunday, December 7. Beside the basic issue of glacial train speed are questions of vehicle and infrastructure reliability. This post summarizes the delays that occurred.
This post is far more detailed than I would normally publish, but the information found its way to me, and a clear understanding of what is going on is in the public interest.
Although the TTC takes the blame for rotten operations, their shuttle buses keep service available to riders. The overwhelming cause of delay is with systems provided and maintained by Metrolinx’ P3 partner, Mosaic. It is extremely difficult to believe that these are new conditions that suddenly manifested when passengers actually rode the trains. Equipment reliability should have been proven in the acceptance process. As for switches failing to operate in cold weather, this is not exactly new technology for Toronto, and in any event Metrolinx claimed that the line had already been through cold weather testing before it opened.
A common delay is that a car’s control system will throw a fault code, but no cause was determined and the car continued in service. Some fault codes cause an emergency brake application including an overspeed condition. These happen often enough to suggest that speed restrictions with automatic stops are set far too conservatively.
Some delays arise from misalignment of cars with platforms. This could be either due to operator error, or to braking issues. Doors are not supposed to be opened with a car in the wrong place, but manual emergency mode operation is to be needed to properly reposition a car.
Some problems with maintaining schedule were reported due to operators unfamiliar with the line. This raises the question of training and the amount of experience they received before revenue operations began.
Aside from equipment failures are delays caused by “vehicle not available”. There are 18 cars in the fleet, and peak service requires 15 leaving three spare for maintenance and change offs of cars from service. It is Mosaic’s job to have those cars available. This problem grew as the week went on. Note that service improvements will be possible only by operating cars on a shorter trip time at the speed originally expected of the line. There are no extra cars to add to the service.
It would be fascinating to read and compare the logs from a few weeks before opening during the final acceptance process. How many of these problems were common then, and was the rate of failures considered “acceptable”? We will probably never know thanks to Metrolinx and TTC secrecy.
In these tables the column “C/O” indicates whether a train was changed off after an issue or remained in service. Most of the time a change off was not required.
The column “OOS” indicates the length of time a train was missing from service. This information was not reported consistently for a few days, and the column is omitted where there is no data.
Events that do not cause a delay and do not indicate an infrastructure or operating failure are omitted.
Text in the “Reason” column has been condensed by me from the official service logs.
Sunday, December 7 (Opening Day)
| Time | Location | Reason | Car | C/O | Delay | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7:29am | Finch West | Doors opened off platform. Operator error. (Ceremonial train) | ||||
| 9:17am | Milvan Rumike | Traction fault code. | 6501 | N | 7 | 17 |
| 9:25am | Milvan Rumike | Brake fault. Resolved by remedial checks. Two trains short turned. | 6512 | N | 5 | 15 |
| 9:34am | Humber College | Multiple fault alarms. Resolved by technician. | 6502 | N | 4 | 14 |
| 9:55am | Humber College | Operator had to use washroom on mezzanine level due to platform level facilities being out of service. | 5 | 15 | ||
| 10:05am | Tobermory | Brake fault. Resolved by remedial checks. | 6514 | N | 4 | 14 |
| 10:10am | Finch West | Train held by technician. Reason unknown. | 6502 | N | 15 | 25 |
| 10:48am | Rowntree Mills | Brake fault. Resolved by remedial checks. | 6517 | N | 5 | 15 |
| 11:03am | Emery | Train removed from service by TTC. | 6509 | Y | 10 | 20 |
| 12:36pm | Norfinch Oakdale | Train removed from service. | 6502 | Y | 10 | 20 |
| 1:37pm | Emery | Train overshot platform. Braking issue. | 6507 | N | 5 | 15 |
| 2:54pm | Emery | Misaligned train. Emergency mode used. | 6501 | N | 3 | 13 |
| 4:16pm | Signet Arrow | Error code. | 6512 | N | 3 | 10 |
| 4:34pm | Sentinel | Misaligned train. Emergency mode used. | 6508 | N | 3 | 13 |
| 6:26pm | Pearldale | Power supply. Train OKed for service. | 6514 | N | 13 | 23 |
| 8:56pm | Martin Grove | Operator unable to maintain headway. One train short turned. | 6512 | N | 12 | 24 |
| 9:12pm | Humber College | Operator using facilities (see also 9:55am) | 7 | 19 | ||
| 9:59pm | Finch West | Operator unable to maintain schedule. | 12 | 24 | ||
| 11:05pm | Humber College | Loss of doors. Recycled OK. | 6512 | N |
Monday, December 8
| Time | Location | Reason | Car | C/O | Delay | Gap | OOS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5:08am | Finch West | Late clearing work zone | 14 | ||||
| 5:28am | Humber College | Operator not in position | 6 | ||||
| 6:44am | Jane | Slow operation from hand-off | 3 | 9 | |||
| 6:46am | Jane | Overspeed indication causing emergency brake | 6507 | N | |||
| 6:55am | Martin Grove | Operator could not open doors and other problems; turned back but took extended time. | 6517 | N | 4 | 10 | |
| 8:10am | Humber College | Operator not in position | 6 | 12 | |||
| 9:41am | Humber College | Operator using facilities | 5 | ||||
| 12:56pm | Rowntree Mills | Misaligned train. Emergency mode used. | 6509 | N | 4 | 14 | |
| 1:11pm | Humber College | Removed from service – mechanical issues. Repaired by technician. | 6517 | N | 10 | 10 | 29 |
| 1:20pm | Humber College | Operator using facilities | 4 | 10 | |||
| 3:01pm | Jane | Late leaving yard. Confusion re crew. | 4 | 14 | |||
| 3:42pm | Sentinel | Heat issue in cab | 6517 | Y | 6 | 12 | 113 |
| 4:41pm | Finch West | HVAC issues | 6512 | N | 6 | 12 | 86 |
| 5:30pm | Albion | Circuit breaker | 6511 | N | 3 | 9 | |
| 9:19pm | Driftwood | Brake problem; also delayed by tech unfamiliar with equipment. | 6503 | N | 9 | 23 | |
| 10:33pm | MSF | Train caught on dead spot. Pushed clear. | 181 |
Tuesday, December 9
| Time | Location | Reason | Car | C/O | Delay | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5:06am | Norfinch Oakdale | Car posted a fault which cleared on its own. | 6501 | N | ||
| 7:16am | Norfinch Oakdale | Indicator lights defective. Cleared on its own. | 6507 | N | ||
| 7:42am | Signet Arrow | Car posted a fault which cleared on its own. | 6514 | N | ||
| 8:33am | Westmore | Car posted faults | 6508 | Y | ||
| 8:56am | Milvan Rumike | Car posted a fault which cleared on its own. | 6514 | N | ||
| 9:01am | Signet Arrow | Car posted a fault which cleared on its own. | 6503 | N | ||
| 9:12am | Humber College | One door not opening. Isolated. | 6516 | N | 6 | 12 |
| 1:05pm | Jane | Misalignment | 6503 | N | 3 | 9 |
| 1:34pm | Tobermory | Overspeed. Car reset and continued. | 6509 | N | ||
| 3:16pm | Humber College | Switch out of service. Repaired by tech. Service turned back at Martin Grove | 92 | 98 | ||
| 3:30pm | Martin Grove | Switch out of service. Repaired by tech. Service turnedback at Mount Olive | 45 | 51 | ||
| 9:48pm | Driftwood | Unspecified operator issue | 10 | 20 | ||
| 10:23pm | Islington | Disabled train. Technician reset circuit breaker. | 6513 | N | 32 | 42 |
| Three storm trains operated to keep line clear. | ||||||
| 11:32pm | Finch West | Flat wheels on car. Deemed unsafe to operate. | 6513 | Y |
Wednesday, December 10
| Time | Location | Reason | Car | C/O | Delay | Gap | OOS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4:56am | Norfinch Oakdale | Car posted a fault which cleared on its own. | 6517 | N | |||
| 5:13am | Norfinch Oakdale | Car posted a fault which cleared on its own. | 6503 | N | |||
| 6:53am | Jane | Car posted a fault which cleared on its own. | 6502 | N | |||
| 7:25am | Jane | Radio issues. Repaired by tech. | 6513 | N | 6 | 12 | 49 |
| 8:40am | Jane | Operator unable to maintain schedule. Unable to short turn service due to loss of control of switches. | 15 | 21 | |||
| 9:03am | Tobermory | Lost control of multiple switches. Repaired by tech. | 15 | 21 | |||
| 12:28pm | Humber College | Overspeed indication tripping emergency brake. Car reset and continued. | 6504 | N | |||
| 1:05pm | Duncanwoods | Loss of control of switches | 5 | 15 | |||
| 6:12pm | Humber College | Operator error | 10 | 20 | 31 | ||
| 6:16pm | Stevenson | Auto broke down on rail. Unable to turn back service due to switches not working (weather). | 6 | 12 | |||
| 7:47pm | York Gate | Switch out of control. Trains rerouted. | |||||
| 8:52pm | Emery | Car posted a fault. Car reset and proceeded. | 6515 | N | |||
| 9:18pm | Humber College | Loss of control of switches. | 100 | 110 | |||
| 9:30pm | Albion | Loss of control of switches. Service on Line 6 suspended. | 100 | 110 |
Thursday, December 11
| Time | Location | Reason | Car | C/O | Delay | Gap | OOS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5:19am | York Gate | Switch failure | 46 | 51 | |||
| 6:21am | Humber College | Switch failure | 93 | 105 | |||
| 7:47am | Jane | No car available. | 6 | 12 | 94 | ||
| 7:48am | Sentinel | Car posted a fault. Car reset and proceeded. | 6501 | N | |||
| 9:21am | Driftwood | Car posted a fault. Car reset and proceeded. | 6506 | N | |||
| 10:38am | Humber College | Emergency brake caused injury to staff on board. | 6515 | N | |||
| 11:30am | Humber College | Communications problem. Repaired by tech enroute. | 6508 | N | 6 | 12 | |
| 3:07pm | Pearldale | Operator unable to maintain schedule due to excessive dwell time at stops. | 6501 | 10 | 16 | ||
| 3:22pm | Finch West | Screen blank. Repaired by mechanic. Car out of service for 116 minutes. | 6517 | N | 6 | 12 | |
| 3:41pm | Jane | No car available. | 6 | 12 | 199 | ||
| 6:21pm | Duncanwoods | Operator unable to maintain schedule. New operator unfamiliar with the line. | 6508 | 15 | 21 | ||
| 8:32pm | Duncanwoods | Operator unable to maintain schedule. | 6506 | 15 | 25 | ||
| 9:27pm | Jane | Emergency brake. Car reset. | 6514 | N | |||
| 10:25pm | Humber College | Car posted a fault. Car reset and proceeded. | 6513 | N |
Friday, December 12
| Time | Location | Reason | Car | C/O | Delay | Gap | OOS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5:10am | Jane | Emergency brake. Car reset and proceeded. | 6506 | N | |||
| 5:17am | Driftwood | Train routed incorrectly. Operator shut down and changed ends, but several errors posted due to pantograph down. Repaired by tech. Train changed off. | 6515 | Y | 4 | 14 | |
| 5:52am | Stevenson | Emergency brake. Car reset and proceeded. | ? | N | 4 | 16 | |
| 5:56am | Humber College | Radio issues. Train changed off. | 6508 | Y | 10 | ||
| 7:25am | Jane | No car available. | 180 | ||||
| 7:47am | Jane | No car available. | 107 | ||||
| 8:00am | Finch West | Compressor issues. Repaired by tech. | 6512 | N | 10 | 20 | |
| 8:08am | Martin Grove | Emergency brake. Car reset and proceeded. | 6501 | N | 3 | 10 | |
| 8:11am | Finch West | Emergency brake due to circuit breaker problem. Car reset and proceeded. | 6511 | ||||
| 8:40am | Signet Arrow | Unable to open doors. | 6507 | N | 3 | 10 | |
| 8:45am | Jane | No heat. Train operated to yard. | 6513 | N | 7 | 14 | 60 |
| 8:48am | York Gate | Switch issue. Repaired by tech. | 6514 | 4 | 14 | ||
| 9:08am | Finch West | No cab heat. | 6507 | Y | 7 | 14 | |
| 11:05am | Humber College | Air compressor problem resolved by tech. | 6512 | N | 10 | 20 | |
| 11:42am | Humber College | Operator issue (unspecified). | 6512 | 10 | 20 | 160 | |
| 1:07pm | Finch West | Mechanical issues, repaired by tech. | 6515 | N | 10 | 20 | |
| 2:34pm | Humber College | No cab heat. Tech unable to repair. Changed off. | 6512 | Y | 7 | 14 | 175 |
| 3:49pm | Jane | No car available. | 7 | 14 | 204 | ||
| 5:26pm | Milvan Rumike | Unable to maintain schedule due to traffic signals, customers and icy rail. Operator new to the line. | 6508 | N | 12 | 19 | |
| 5:55pm | Emery | Misalignment. Spin-slide occurred before stop. | 6511 | N | 4 | 11 | |
| 6:00pm | Humber College | Car posted a fault. Car reset and proceeded. | 6506 | N | 10 | 17 | |
| 6:06pm | Finch West | Overspeed. Car reset and proceeded. | 6509 | N | 7 | 14 | |
| 9:04pm | Finch West | Sander problem. Car changed off. | 6504 | Y | 7 | 12 |
I bet this is fascinating to you! It’s shocking to me that the New Finch is far worse than taking the bus! There’s talk that people can walk faster than the new whatever it is, LRT? After all the years of suffering for people who live along the Finch area, it’s shocking that it would begin so poorly – and after so long.
Same for the Eglinton line with a never ever end date – or is that start date?
Makes me wonder how the new Pape line will work?!
Good Morning Steve!!!
LikeLike
Reading this, I conducted a thought experiment. Imagine if this line was built in, say, 1982 (leave aside the fact the subway didn’t go up to Finch and Keele back then). TTC gauge, extra CLRV’s/ALRV’s ordered specifically for this line, no over-designed signal/switch systems, just standard TTC equipment that somehow allowed for multiple-unit operation like the Witts (Yonge) and Queen (PCCs). Old-school Inspectors with clipboards at key intersections keeping an eye on things. Would we be having this discussion?
Methinks we’ve “overdesigned” our way to producing results that worsen commensurate with “advances” in technology to the point where, at least in Finch’s case so far, we’d be better off if nothing had been built at all.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It seems both this line and Eglinton are plagued with systems integration problems and that the P3 contractors have installed lot of fancy complex technology (which probably looked nice in the brochures and in the ads in the trade press) that doesn’t work properly. For instance does this line really need an “alignment” system, does management not trust the operators to not open the doors if it is unsafe to do so (and has anyone been injured on killed on the subway for lack of such a system there)?
Ironically it seems Metrolinx lost of sight of one of the big lessons of the original light rail boom (which Calgary Transit did understand when building the initial C-Train system in the 80s) to use proven technology and avoid as much complexity as possible.
LikeLike
That one in particular is of interest on a brand new line. I know the cars were out testing a lot already, but hasn’t someone been monitoring the most basic maintenance items required on a checklist each day such that this doesn’t come as a surprise?
Steve: It was out as a storm car and probably created the flats by sliding rather than braking.
LikeLike
What a sad story this tells. I’m curious that there are quite a few surprisingly short delays (< 10 m) where the problem was dealt with by a technician/mechanic. Does each train have a technician on board "just in case"? If so, maybe they could do fare inspections while they wait for the next mechanical issue… Presumably they don't travel to the trouble spots by LRT (sorry, little jokes there – can't resist). Maybe they sit parked in idling pickup trucks strategically spaced out along the route? Who is paying for all these people to hang around? TTC operating budget, Metrolinx, Mosaic?
Steve: They will be in Mosaic’s budget.
LikeLike
Back in 1982 CLRVs and PCCs rocketed along The Queensway on open ballast track. The PCCs did tend to hunt a bit, and the CLRVs would sway on their soft suspension.
Typically no one was waiting at Colborne Lodge Drive stops, and the streetcars would run full speed through the intersection and continue down the track unabated.
So we’ve now had 40+ years of progress….
LikeLiked by 2 people
The same goes for the automatically applied braking! I’m sick of this “sAfEtY” culture that helps no one except for some useless desk jockey accumulating their own personal stats.
All of these systems should be disabled immediately and ripped out to prevent management from being tempted to use them again.
As for the vehicles being lemons… didn’t somebody else have that experience already? I guess nobody fixed anything between model years.
The elevated Ontario line has all of its systems exposed to the sky. Can't wait to see how all of that infrastructure (e.g. switches) work with these people managing it!
LikeLike
I remember line 3 Scarborough when it opened there were a lot of issues especially trains running slow. We have to give some time for line 6 . It will prove itself.
Steve: After months of testing it should run like a clock
LikeLike
Mosaic definitely has their fair share of responsibilities, though we won’t know if they truly fulfilled their contractual obligations regarding travel time and availability until Metrolinx releases the details. However, the TTC simply lacks political sensitivity. Chair Jamaal Myers, in particular, is poor at expectation management. I still hear him saying, ‘we got 100 years of experience’ loud and clear—he sounded so confident, but I bet City Hall went into crisis mode shortly after that.
I disagree that the technology is overly complex. It is a proven signaling system built right here in Toronto (used by SkyTrain and the RT), and Ottawa uses the same signaling and vehicle combination. The question is how prepared the TTC was after taking over from Metrolinx.
Judging by the city officials’ performance in the meeting, it appears they don’t even know Ontario has two other LRT systems in Waterloo and Ottawa! I am confident those agencies would be willing to share valuable real-life experience regarding TSP and running an LRT in Ontario weather if the TTC paid them a visit. Or did the TTC just rely entirely on Mosaic and Metrolinx for knowledge?
Politically speaking, the TTC is taking all the blame while appearing unprepared to answer difficult technical questions. Almost all operators manage expectations by warning people to expect problems during a soft launch. They shouldn’t have been overly confident only to fail spectacularly.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Whenever I hear “ Public Private Partnership “ P3s
I will respond that they are really P4s
Public Pays
Private Profits
This screwup along with the Eglington Line and the Ottawa LRT are the sole fault of Doug Ford inserting his ideology that private companies have more expertise than the dedicated and experienced engineers employed by the TTC.
Steve: I hate to defend DoFo but the whole 3P mess started under McGuinty through Infrastructure Ontario. Ford inherited and built in this.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The entry for car 6501 at 3:07 PM on November 11 isn’t exactly correct. The car stopped at Emery, and the operator couldn’t open the doors. I saw him pick up the phone and call transit control for help. The doors opened after a while. The operator had trouble getting the car to move again after the stop was service and the doors were closed.
Steve: The description in the table is condensed. Here is more detail with names removed:
LikeLike
How much more frequent and/or more severe is this list above the mean for such systems. 1 sigma? 3? 6?
My layman’s expectation is that opening week will not be flawless. But these errors would seem to indicate failures in nearly every area including training, maintenance, integration and possibly design, none of which should be unknown before revenue service began. I imagine and trust that the TTC can remedy training issues. However, most issues lie with Metrolinx’s P3 consortium members. Are there any public details about sticks and carrots for the members to correct these issues?
Steve: The contracts between Metrolinx and the P3 members are all confidential. Perish the thought we might know what they are expected to do and at what cost, let alone what penalties for non-performance.
LikeLike
Steve, would you happen to know when the start date begins on a P3’s 30-year maintenance portion of a “build-design-finance-operate-maintain” contact? Is it when the contract is initially signed, when the owner gets the keys, or the line opens?
From your knowledge, is there any precedent for the line’s owner to cancel the maintenance contract early and hand it over to someone else, like say, a large Canadian public transit agency with an experienced streetcar maintenance and overhaul shop?
Steve: None of the details are public. As for a “handover”, things have to get a lot worse before that would happen. The obvious analogy is the restoration of public control over privatized rail and transit operations in the UK, and the desire of various parties to address problems rather than covering their asses on a bad business model.
LikeLike
Thanks Steve, and commenters.
Something on CBC site about a runner being faster than this service, sigh.
And will we wake up to be realizing that while we need transit investment, mere Big Spending isn’t always the way for a set of reasons, and burying the billions tends to benefit construction interests ahead of public interest, as heaven forbid we really try transit priority, including at stoplights. Misrule by carservatives of all parties? (And the costs of cars to the public tend to be as well obscured as contract details; it’s not just these P3s sigh)
LikeLiked by 1 person
I don’t think the Ottawa Confederation Line was a P3. It still managed to be a problem child.
Steve: Yes, Ottawa was a P3. From the Key Findings of the judicial ninquiry report:
IO’s hands are not clean in this either having lumbered both Ottawa and Toronto/Metrolinx with hard-to-manage contract structures. I remember a very self-congratulatory presentation at Metrolinx by David Livingston, then head of IO, subsequently a guest of Her Majesty for destruction of records related to the gas plant scandal, on the wonders of P3s.
LikeLike
Ah. The wikipedia article on the O Train does not mention any of this.
Steve: There is reference in the article to design-build-maintain procurement with is effectively a P3 because it outsources the construction and operation of the line. There is also reference to contracts with various vendors to build and operate parts of the system.
LikeLike
Steve – not really a question but more of a comment. I just wanted to thank you for all of the work that you put into this – to the sites, to answering posts, etc. I’ve been following your site for years and as of late there seems to be some misguided hostility towards you and – I’m not sure if this is Line 6 frustration being directed towards you, but whatever the case is, it’s noticeable. So rather than you having to defend yourself, I just wanted to say thank you for keeping all of us informed, for keeping the TTC and Metrolinx accountable, and Happy Holidays.
Steve: You are very welcome. There are a few trolls who see Finch, and Eglinton to come, as a vindication of their loathing for my LRT advocacy, and in particular what they see as my attempt to deny Scarborough the subway it so richly “deserves”. Their remarks here are almost always archived and then deleted unless they something vaguely intelligent from time to time, and without a mixture of racist, ageist and sexual slurs. It gives me great delight to “put them in their place”, the trash.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Is there a map anywhere that shows the line 6 with respect to the local roads? I went to school at Mount Olive and Kipling and I’m not sure where the line would go there. (That was before they pushed Finch beyond Islington.)
Any suggestions where to park in order to ride the line? I have to come in from Guelph.
David
Steve: Look at the system route map and zoom in to the NW corner of the map. Alternately, you can use Google Maps which shows where the transit stops are along the route. There is a huge parking lot at Albion Mall, as well as over at Humber College.
LikeLike
Steve, first of all thank you for your excellent work.
Steve: You’re very welcome!
I’m a bit new to infrastructure watching. Is the level of secrecy and complete lack of public transparency we’ve recently seen around contracts, transit-related policies, service expectations, and maintenance (in reference to Finch & Eglinton specifically) unusual or par for the course when it comes to Ontario / Canadian transit agencies historically?
I.e. do you perceive this as a Metrolinx-related phenomenon or is more systematic? Was it like this in the 80s / 90s?
Steve: It is peculiar to Metrolinx which is extremely secretive as a provincial agency. Municipalities are subject to much greater transparency requirements. The situation varies across the country, but Ontario is notorious for keeping info confidential.
LikeLike
Yes, thanks again Steve, for much!
With opacity, there was an event by IMFG at UofT on Feb. 14 of one year not too long ago where one of the leading experts made reference to how Italy did have a problem with mafia corruption, and now so much/all of the large projects have their costs available as anti-corruption measure, but in Ontario, opacity is the norm. And indeed, what are a few billions here and there eg. burying the Eglinton LRT W for another couple of billion, and so much of the rest of the big projects (boonDougles?) also bury the billions, and I’ve a strong sense that there’s been zero interest in cheaper fixes, tho that may partially, or largely be, the sheer ‘carservative’ politricks of folks in cars (and some devilopers) mattering far more than the public interest. So the ‘cui bono’ is well worth asking about, though Liberals got away with the Sorbara subway extension beyond York University.
And I may not know so much about all of this, but it’s seeming to be really stupid to add even further extensions to already brittle subway spines, and not try to have far more of a network, including new lines in existing linear corridors, yes, including the Don Valley Excessway, or parts of it. (Flooding is an issue, yes, but how about a pavement tax upstream to reduce surge? – oh, the votorists and we are carrupt for sure, with hints of ‘carmunism’, so the lack of real transit priority at signals really has to go to boost transit and get better value for the transit users/taxpayers.
The stat from Vancouver, BC from Globe of Jan 10/96 of every car having c $2700 of avoided cost/subsidy, 7x more than transit subsidy, still fits, and if the costs of congestion here have risen so high, ahem, it’s ‘cargestion’, tho Queen’s Park is far too Congested, filled with Con-self-servatives.
LikeLike
Hi Steve.
I also want to thank you for your work on this file. Talk about a full time job.
One thing that makes me scratch my head on this is how ION, with no prior rail experience, managed to build and operate the line with little of this kind of crap. I am also astounded that no one seemed to have bothered to pay them a visit and see what they are doing and compare it to the state of Finch West and Eglinton.
Heads should roll at both the TTC and Metrolinx. Whoever thinks that it is acceptable to spend $2.5 billion on Finch to provide a slower service than the buses it replaced has no business working in public transit.
LikeLike
City council finally voted to give LRTs and streetcars signal priority! Cautiously optimistic, as the exact implementation remains to be seen. It’s unfortunate it took this debacle to have this discussion and movement. Ideally the inertia keeps this moving to improve all streetcars to much higher standards as a viable alternative to running.
Hopefully Mississauga takes note for their LRT.
LikeLike
Steve,
Firstly, thanks so much for all your work at advocacy on these issues!
I’ve heard the issue of nearside vs farside stops discussed in the case of Finch. Currently with the farside stops, vehicles sometimes need to stop before a red light, and then again after the intersection at the platform as I’m sure you know. Is there any insight on how the decision is made to go with nearside or farside at specific intersections and what works best in terms of overall flow?
Thanks again!
Steve: As TTC staff said at the Council meeting, farside depends on having signal priority. This means more than just getting a bit more green time, but instead having transit its green as soon as it can be inserted in the cycle. City staff talk a lot about green time extension and truncation of reds, but not of changes to insert a transit phase when a transit vehicle is present. That said, on a frequent route there will almost always be a transit vehicle, but not every route all the time.
In the specific cases of Finch and Eglinton, sometimes the decision is based on available land for the stations where farside in both directions is not possible. In all of this, design decisions about what would actually be implemented have compromised the original hopes for the line.
LikeLike
I’m wondering was Rob Ford right about SUBWAYS, SUBWAYS, SUBWAYS?!
Sure feels like it!
Steve: If Transit City had been proposed as only subways, only Eglinton would have been built, and maybe not even that.
LikeLike
The line 6 LRT is an example of how NOT to build a “rapid” transit line. This is a classic case of too many cooks in the kitchen. Involved are: 1-Metrolinx, 2-Mosaic Transit Group (a consortium of ACS Infrastructure Canada (Spain), Aecon (Canada), and CRH Canada Group (Dublin)) to design, finance, build, & maintain; 3-the Premier & Minister of Transport of Ontario; 4-Infrastructure Ontario; 5-Toronto Transportation Services; 6-City Council and mayor; 7-TTC board; 8-TTC management; and probably others.
LRT means light-rail transit, but once this moniker is used to describe what is essentially a streetcar line, it immediately takes on an air of grandeur. I started wondering how the Finch West LRT compares with other streetcar/LRTs on ROWs in Toronto. (My data comes from Transit Toronto and Wikipedia.)
Finch West LRT Line 6 – 36 Finch West bus carried 42,600 passengers a weekday in the 2010s. LRT line length is 10.3 km., 18 stops, estimated cost 2023 $2.5B, March 2025 $3.85B (373.8M per km, under construction from 2016 to Dec. 7, 2025, In late May 2024 a light-rail vehicle made the first test run along the entire line, from Finch West station to Humber College station, with speeds up to 60 km/h; Alstom Citadis Spirit light rail vehicles are used on the line; maintenance and storage facility (MSF) on a 100,000-square-metre (1,100,000 sq ft) site.
St. Clair 512, built from summer 2005 (an injunction halted construction at the start) completed June 30, 2010, line length 7.1 km, 24 on-street stops, 29 minutes travel time, daily ridership 26,643 (2022, weekdays), project was initially budgeted at $65 million when it was approved in 2005, and the final cost was tallied at $106 million ($14.9M) per km).
Spadina 510, streetcars returned on Spadina July 27, 1997, Charlotte Loop opened in March 1999,
Harbourfront 509, Construction from May 1992, Opened 22 June 1990; rebuilt 2012–2014, line length 4.4 km, Daily ridership 10,717 (2022, weekdays),
Lakeshore 508 “Queensway LRT”, The streetcar right-of-way (ROW) along the Queensway opened on July 20, 1957, together with the new Humber Loop. The project to build the Queensway and the ROW from Roncesvalles to the Humber River cost $4.9 million. On January 6, 1992, the 508 route began as an experiment, (out of 507 Long Branch, 501 Queen), suspended 2015-2019, again discontinued March 24, 2020, reopened October 29 2023, Effective September 2, 2025, route runs east to Distillery Loop.
Ontario Line Line 3, now set to be $1.74 billion per kilometre; As of August 2024, the estimated cost for the 15.6-kilometre (9.7 mi) line is CA$27 billion with an estimated completion in 2031.
Eglinton East LRT, potentially $250 million per km.
Waterfront East LRT, If construction were to be funded, the line could open in the early to mid-2030s, according to planning staff. In 2023, planners had hoped for a partial line opening along Queens Quay East between 2030 and 2033 but with Union Station bypassed. The project would have fully opened sometime between 2032 and 2035. Cost estimates over the years were $520 million (2015), $700 million (2019), October 2023 $2.67 billion over 10 years2023 (incl. $932 million for Union Station Loop).
Steve: Be careful with those costs. I have not cross checked them but Metrolinx includes 30 years of ops and maintenance in the total because of how the P3s are structured. This means that the cost/km is not directly comparable to other lines that only have capital costs included.
LikeLike
Sure feels like it!
Even if we had gotten only one good line, it would have been better than the two GARBAGE LRT lines we got. Mayor Ford was 100% correct but unelected streetcar advocates like Steve pushed through streetcars/LRT which are slower than walking. Steve will probably delete this comment but that only shows that Steve knows how wrong he was.
Steve: You assign far more power to me than I actually have. The TTC proposed an LRT network back in 1968, but this was killed off by a provincial flirtation with high tech transit that quite literally never got off the ground. Transit City was proposed when there was no money available for anything, and overbuilding subways where they were not needed was simply not in the cards. I did not “push through” LRT lines, although I certainly supported the proposals.
The poor performance on Finch is down to a mixture of factors notably provincial interference in the contract and ridiculous constraints on the operation by the City and/or TTC. But the construction and equipment selection for Lines 5 and 6 are 100% provincial. They can’t even build tunnels properly as we have seen with some of the problems on Eglinton.
Normally I delete comments like this which seem to come from only a handful of real people who in spite of many different “names” have a consistent style. This time there is no racist language (among many other sins) and it’s worth replying, once, to your garbage premise.
LikeLike
More like dine and dash. When it comes time to pay the bill you and people like you will always be gone already. See Crack Ford when he famously refused taxes to pay for his subway fantasies and at the same time him and brother Hash Ford both shilled for P3’s like the ones being used for Eglinton, Hurontario, and Finch to pay for it all.
LikeLike
I quickly put the data tables in excel to see what the main causes of delay. Through all the data there is 991 minutes of total delay. The top 5 common causes of delay all involve switches for a total of 476 minutes or 48% of the total delay. Seems like there are some pretty huge gains to be made by fixing this issue, hoping the TTC/Metrolinx can resolve this soon.
LikeLike