King/Church Update: June 26, 2025

Two proposals before City Council attempt to deal with congestion issues downtown brought on by the King/Church water main and track reconstruction.

MM31.17 – Speeding Up Streetcars: Traffic Amendments on Adelaide Street, King Street and York Street – by Mayor Olivia Chow, seconded by Deputy Mayor Ausma Malik

This motion proposes the relocation of parking and loading zones from Adelaide Street to nearby streets to free up capacity on Adelaide.

Currently, the Financial District Business Improvement Area and their stakeholders use loading zones on the south side of Adelaide Street West, from Yonge Street to York Street, between 10:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m., Monday to Friday. Based on the travel time data, streetcar operations are negatively impacted when the loading operations are in effect.

In consultation with the Toronto Transit Commission, Transportation Services and the Financial District have agreed that temporary loading zones will be established on the west side of York Street, between King Street West and Wellington Street, and on the north side of King Street West, between Yonge Street and York Street.

Delivery drivers will queue in the new loading zones, where Traffic Control Persons will marshal the delivery drivers into the loading bay only when it is clear. With the temporary loading zones in place, stopping will be prohibited on Adelaide Street West from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., Monday to Sunday.

Mayor Chow proposed an amendment to her own motion authorizing payment “to deploy additional paid duty officers at seven locations near the King and Church worksite to manage traffic flow”.

MM31.18 – Re-Opening King Street for Business: Keeping Toronto’s Downtown Core and Canada’s Financial District Moving – by Councillor Brad Bradford, seconded by Councillor Stephen Holyday

This motion proposes the reopening of through traffic on King Street where streetcars are not operating during the construction diversion.

City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services, to make any necessary changes to reopen the portion of King Street between Spadina Avenue and Church Street to vehicular traffic for the duration of the King Street East and Church Street intersection closure, where streetcars are not currently in service.

Mayor Chow proposed an amendment limiting the reopened area to portions where “streetcars and buses” are not operating. This effectively neuters the motion because the only portion of King with no transit service now is east of Yonge Street.

The debate was mired by a combination of political rivalries, lack of familiarity with the affected area and transit services, and disinformation either through ignorance or misrepresentation.

The Mayor’s motion MM31.17 and amendment carried on a show of hands.

The Mayor’s proposed amendment to MM31.18 carried by 16-5. The motion as amended carried on a show of hands.

The debate was hampered by the absence of basic information such as a map and detailed information on items such as existing transit services, traffic pinch points and loading zone locations.

In support of his claim that King Street could be reopened, Councillor Bradford showed a photo looking west on King from Simcoe with the street completely devoid of traffic. The photo was taken at 6:30pm on Monday.

  • Monday is a very light day for office-bound traffic due to work-from-home patterns. This is also reflected in day-of-the-week travel time differences shown later in this article.
  • The theatre district (Roy Thomson Hall, Royal Alexandra and Princess of Wales Theatres, TIFF) are dark on Mondays, and there is little tourist traffic. There was no major event at the Rogers Centre.

Although an empty road can be found at times, the photo is deeply misleading, and Bradford should know better.

Among the most striking pieces of disinformation was the claim that replacement bus service carries far fewer riders than the streetcars did along the King Street corridor. When asked, staff gave riding figures of 24,000 on the King Street replacement bus, and 60,000 per day for the streetcars. These are all day values for the entire route, not for riding on the King Street transit corridor itself. At no point was there any discussion of the frequency (and hence capacity) of service. These numbers were cited by various Councillors to claim that transit priority was not needed on King because so many fewer people were riding there.

City staff should be chastised for failing to correct this point and for giving an answer that did not properly illuminate the comparison between service levels.

For the record, the scheduled service on the central portion of King Street with streetcars and buses is shown below. Note that there is substantially less scheduled capacity with the replacement bus service. Buses on King are quite crowded, and service is bunched and erratic.

It is quite likely that there are fewer riders on the buses than on the streetcars, although a major contributing factor will be the level of service provided by the TTC. From a capacity viewpoint, a service of 18 buses/hour with 50/bus (greater than the Service Standard level) would be 900 riders per hour past a point. The streetcar service would have a capacity more than double that level.

PM Peak ServiceStreetcar Service (Apr/25)Bus Service (June/25)
504A Distillery-Dundas West10′ (6 cars/hour)
504B Broadview-Dundas West10′ (6 cars/hour)
503 Kingston Road
(EB from York)
10′ (6 cars/hour)
508 Lake Shore20′ (3 cars/hour)
504D Broadview-Bathurst5′ (12 buses/hour)
504C Distillery-Bathurst10′ (6 buses/hour)

In the course of the debate, Mayor Chow noted that work at King & Church is progressing well and should be finished by August 8. This may allow the road to reopen, but resumption of streetcar service depends on the TTC finishing their work including reconstruction of streetcar overhead at that intersection and along King Street East.

The remainder of this article updates previously-published charts about streetcar travel times on Richmond and Adelaide Streets.

Since early May, all streetcar service normally on King has diverted via Queen between Spadina and the Don Bridge. In the core, streetcars have used the Ontario Line diversion via Church, Richmond/Adelaide and York Streets. In June, traffic conditions changed with the closing of the King/Church intersection. This diverted replacement bus service between Jarvis and Yonge, but also changed traffic patterns on nearby streets as motorists could not drive through King/Church.

The charts below compare travel times between University and Jarvis in three periods. 501 Queen data are used because this route did not change over the period and provides “pre” and “post” data (except for the week of April 28 when the Queen car itself was diverted).

  • Pre-construction while King was still open (April 21-25, May 5-9).
  • Streetcar diversion via Queen, but with King/Church open for motorists (May 12-30).
  • Streetcar diversion via Queen with King/Church closed to all traffic (June 2-20).

Eastbound from University to Jarvis Weekdays

Note that travel times are less erratic from June 2 onward. From personal observation, an important change was that with Church Street closed at King, the queue of northbound traffic on Church trapping eastbound streetcars (and hence traffic on Adelaide) was reduced.

Westbound from Jarvis to University Weekdays

Although there has been a lot of focus on Adelaide Street, Richmond is not without its problems particularly in the PM peak and early evening, although like the eastbound travel times, these have improved since June 2.

The very long travel time on Thursday May 29 was caused by a medical emergency. No eAlert was issued for Wednesday May 28.

Weekends Westbound

Weekends Eastbound

Eastbound travel times are particularly bad on Saturdays from mid-afternoon onward through the late evening. This is an example of how a focus on weekday peak periods for hands-on traffic management is not sufficient to deal with all problems.

12 thoughts on “King/Church Update: June 26, 2025

  1. When will the priority be for transit vehicles over the private motor vehicles? Shouldn’t vehicles that can carry 40 to 200 people get priority over the single-occupant motor vehicle? We still have politicians and ratepayers wanting the single-occupant motor vehicle to get the right-of-way over transit, bicycles, and pedestrians.

    Like

  2. Will the City also be looking at improving the replacement bus service? I sat in a 504 bus the other day that was waiting for 10 minutes to turn left at Front and Jarvis. It wasn’t that there was a lot of traffic waiting ahead of us. It’s just that there’s no left turn signal there and there’s pedestrians crossing throughout the green light, so only two cars or one bus can sneak through at the end of the green.

    Steve: Honestly, I don’t know. There seems to be so much focus on King and Adelaide that the extra support needed for the bus diversion falls through the cracks. Some of the debate at council had the sense of planning that could have, should have been done, but wasn’t and we’re playing catch-up. With a two-to-three week delay for implementation of traffic signal changes, we are at a point where any physical change has a very limited period it would be in place before the routes change again. The advantage of traffic wardens is that they can be deployed without a lot of lead time or expense for short-lived signal and signage changes. The City plans to increase their numbers, but there is no word on where and when they will be deployed.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. This afternoon about 2pm there were two Traffic Agents at King and Jarvis and SIX of them at Front & Jarvis (4 active and 2 watching). The two groups did not seem too well coordinated but they were making 504 busses run somewhat better. Seeing Agents at King and Jarvis is fairly common but not so much so at Front & Jarvis.

    Steve: Yes, I saw them when riding by on the bus about 5:30. About time!

    Like

  4. This effectively neuters the motion because the only portion of King with no transit service now is east of Yonge Street.

    There is no transit service on King between Bathurst and Shaw.

    Steve: Not true, although service west of Bathurst is poor because only occasional 504D buses make it that far. Looking at vehicle tracking data, buses are operating west on King to Dufferin Loop as I write this reply.

    In any event, Bradford’s motion only applied to the portion of King which is a transit corridor, and that is from Bathurst to Jarvis.

    Like

  5. B. Bradford might or might not know better, but I’m pretty sure he doesn’t care. Having seen the outstanding political success enjoyed by Junior Holyday, Bradford has decided to join the Comfortable Middle Aged White Guy Curmudgeon Club.

    I take any proposals from Bradford same as from Holyday, which is to ignore them as pandering postures.

    Liked by 1 person

  6. Steve: Not true, although service west of Bathurst is poor because only occasional 504D buses make it that far. Looking at vehicle tracking data, buses are operating west on King to Dufferin Loop as I write this reply.

    I may need to grab a case of beer and a lawn chair and see how long it takes for a bus to arrive at King & Strachan, because I certainly have not seen a vehicle on that stretch and I pass through it multiple times per day.

    Steve: As I write this at 2:57 pm on June 28, bus 8657 is westbound at Tecumseth. If you rush out with your beer and lawn chair, you should see it pass. That said, a lot of the 504D buses only make it to Bathurst Street and the proportion goes up as congestion builds downtown.

    Like

  7. I decided to monitor the feed while meal prepping today, between 12:00 and 13:30. At 13:00 a bus crossed Bathurst westbound. A pair of RAD busses crossed Bathurst westbound at approximately 13:06. Two more seem to have crossed at 13:20 or so, then the next bus visible was still down by Broadview.

    So obviously you are correct that the TTC is operating vehicles on that stretch but to call it service is to bastardize the word beyond the TTC’s usual use of it to manage lines.

    Steve: I plan to publish an analysis of the 504C/D operations in July.

    Like

  8. Four 504 buses were lined up on Front trying to turn left onto Jarvis today about 3pm. OK, the Pride diversions cannot have helped, but they really need Traffic Agents there (and at King) 7 days a week.

    Like

  9. Yesterday, I was on a westbound 504 streetcar stuck on Queen at Parliament. The streetcar driver suggested that we walk because of the traffic. We walked up to Church counting the streetcars in the queue. There were at least 16.

    They have to be able to do better than this.

    Steve: Looking at the tracking chart for yesterday’s service, the congestion started at about 12:30pm and dd not relent until 8pm or so. I can put some of this, but not all, down to the Pride parade, but there was never an actual stoppage, only very, very slow progress along the route. We have reached the point where re-opening of King Street to traffic is about 6 weeks away (the Mayor cited August 8 in a recent Council meeting), and by the time anything significant gets organized, we won’t need it. There seems to be an attitude in the City of making do with whatever happens because it’s “temporary”. I suspect FIFA will be a real mess because nobody has the guts to tell motorists to just get lost during major events.

    Liked by 1 person

  10. I can put some of this, but not all, down to the Pride parade

    Why is Pride any excuse? I can share the exact date and time of the next 25 Pride parades. I’m happy to share the details so the TTC can start planning and avoid having 16 cars stuck at Church.

    Just to keep them up to date, after Labour Day there is a festival called TIFF. It will require diversions along King between University and Spadina. The choices are to plan for diversions that keep the streetcars moving or F around and Find Out.

    Steve: I didn’t say it was an excuse, only that it happened. TTC/City were asleep at the switch by not looking after spillover effects away from the parade/street party. As for Tiff, that’s its own can of worms which will be compounded by more service changes and diversions elsewhere on the route.

    Like

  11. I didn’t say it was an excuse, only that it happened

    I was not in any way pointing a finger at you.

    Steve: Understood. I mentioned it for context for other readers.

    Like

  12. In the course of the debate, Mayor Chow noted that work at King & Church is progressing well and should be finished by August 8. This may allow the road to reopen, but resumption of streetcar service depends on the TTC finishing their work including reconstruction of streetcar overhead at that intersection and along King Street East.

    It’s August 8 now and whether it reopens soon or not I’ll note they started cutting up the concrete at the Sumach junction today for some kind of track work.

    Steve: Streetcars will not return until September, but once the concrete at Church cures, the buses can resume operation there along with other road traffic.

    Like

Comments are closed.