A comment thread developed elsewhere on this site about “Transit Priority Signalling” and what, exactly, this means in Toronto, and more recently in York Region.
I will move the related comments to this post to keep them together.
Service Cost and Quality
TTC Service Changes Effective September 1, 2013
The TTC will revert to its fall schedules across the system on the Labour Day weekend. The schedule period starts on Sunday, September 1, but the first weekday will be Tuesday, September 3.
The summer changes implemented on June 23, 2013, will be reversed and many improvements, primarily in off-peak periods, will start in September with more to follow later in the year. Because many construction projects are stretching the bus fleet thin, some improvements cannot begin as soon as planned.
TTC Service Changes Effective August 4, 2013 (Update 2)
Updated August 1, 2013 at 2:45pm:
The plans for the King/Spadina project originally would have seen streetcars replaced with buses from Spadina Station to Queen’s Quay for the entire month of August. This has been changed so that streetcars will return between Spadina Station and King Street on August 20 (presuming that reconstruction of the intersection has progressed sufficiently for this).
Plans for a 522 Exhibition West streetcar service have been cancelled and the 193 Exhibition Rocket will operate as usual. The 521 Exhibition East streetcar service will operate from King & Church to the CNE as previously announced.
Streetcar service on 511 Bathurst will be supplemented with buses during evenings and weekends.
Where and When Is King Street Congested? (Updated)
Updated July 31, 2013 at 2:45pm:
In response to comments I have received, I have produced charts that show the average speed of operation on parts of the King route. This is at a very fine detail by contrast to the “link time” charts covering route segments that I published in earlier articles. The new material is added at the end of this article.
Original article from July 22, 2013:
The TTC’s Andy Byford has proposed that King Street be reserved for transit vehicles during the AM peak period as a means of improving service quality. In previous articles I have examined service reliability and congestion, as well as the history of transit priority on King Street.
The big issue whenever “congestion” comes up for discussion is that any tactics adopted to improve transit service need to address what is really happening on the street, not an abstract idea that somewhere, sometime, it might be a good idea to have some sort of transit priority. Previous analyses published here show the effects of congestion through charts of “link times” (the time taken by vehicles to travel of specific parts, or links, of a route), but these don’t pinpoint the exact locations or severity of delays.
This article introduces a new type of chart that is intended to make delay locations and times much more obvious as a starting point for discussions of where priority is needed.
Memo to Glen Murray & Karen Stintz: Are You Really Serious About Transit in Scarborough?
With all the upheaval of transit plans for Scarborough, politicians fall over each other to tell Scarborough residents how downtrodden and ignored they have been, how they always get the short end of the transit stick. How will we fix this? Build them a subway!
Mind you, that subway won’t open for 10 years, and riders on the Scarborough RT will have to endure more cold winters and overcrowded service, not to mention bus routes that run occasionally and unreliably.
We should remember what Scarborough was originally promised with the Transit City scheme announced years ago by then-Mayor Miller and now-Candidate Adam Giambrone:
- An LRT line from an underground station at Don Mills & Sheppard with a direct connection to the Sheppard subway running east to Morningside and beyond.
- An LRT line from Kennedy Station east and north via Eglinton, Kingston Road and Morningside to Sheppard serving the University of Toronto Scarborough Campus (UTSC).
- An upgraded and extended Scarborough RT using LRT to reach east and north to Malvern Centre.
The Sheppard LRT is “funded” by Queen’s Park, but actual construction is a moving target with completion now planned for 2021.
The Eglinton/Morningside line (aka “Scarborough-Malvern”) drifts in limbo not even a part of the Metrolinx “Next Wave” implying completion at best by the late 2020s.
The Scarborough LRT has been replaced by the Scarborough Subway. Although Council attached many conditions to the financing for that line, you can bet that no politician in Toronto is willing to pull the plug, to return to the LRT scheme, with provincial and municipal election fortunes in play. One way or another, even by the simple expedient of giving Ottawa more time to pony up “their fair share” (whatever that means), the subway scheme will stay alive, and the Scarborough LRT will start to resemble Monty Python’s “dead parrot”. It will be “sleeping” only in the minds of its most ardent advocates.
Politicians love to tell us how much they support better transit in Scarborough, and they could start by talking about something more than the subway.
How Many Streetcars Will Fit at King & Spadina? (Update 2)
Updated July 4, 2013 at 7:50pm: Observations of actual operations at the intersection for one hour today have been added. These reveal that the level of service actually operated on all routes (except 508 Lake Shore) is less than advertised. Although traffic congestion causes some backlogs of westbound cars, the number of movements, especially the west-to-north turn, is low enough to fit within the available traffic signal cycles. This would not be the case if 100% of the service were operated.
See the end of the article for details.
Updated June 28, 2013 at 6:30pm: Information on traffic signal timings has been added to this article.
The original article follows the break below.
Real Time Animation of TTC Operations
A regular reader of this site, Daniel Tripp, has created a website that can display TTC vehicle locations and movements with new wrinkles in functionality compared to other sites and apps.
His site is called The Unofficial TTC Traffic Report and there is an explanatory video on YouTube. As of July 4, it only supports a subset of the network with the major downtown routes.
There are two ways to select which routes and directions you will see:
- Moving “start” and “end” points around on the map will dynamically change the display to give info on the trip options you have for your journey.
- Clicking on a route will allow you to add or delete it from the display and select the direction’s service to be viewed.
The routes are shown with colour coding to indicate the speed of operation over each part of the line.
A particularly interesting feature is a half-hour long animated view showing the movement of vehicles. This makes it possible to review recent history without having to stare at the “current” display of routes and remember what is going on.
Occasionally, you will see a vehicle somewhere that is impossible (a streetcar on a street or path that is not part of the network). From my own experience, this is a function of GPS errors which are common on certain TTC vehicles.
The app is still in development. Contact info for the author is in the About page. Please send suggestions to him.
TTC Meeting Wrapup for June 24, 2013
Aside from the King Street transit lanes and the new streetcar rollout plans (covered elsewhere), there wasn’t much else on the agenda for the TTC Board (as it now styles itself).
One procedural change was that there are no longer any printed agendas for the meeting — reports are available only online. If you’re not carrying a device that can display them easily, you’re flying blind making sense of the meeting.
Ridership for reporting period 4 (mainly the month of April) was 1.1% below budget, but 2.2% above the corresponding period in 2012. Poor April weather (an unusually cold early spring) was blamed for the shortfall. For the last twelve months (May 2012 to April 2013), ridership is up 2.4%.
For the year 2013, ridership is expected to be at the budgeted level of 528-million. However, the average fare is lower than projected because of higher pass usage, and the revenue projections are down by $2.0m. This is offset net savings in expense lines. On the entire budget, this is a variation of less than 1.5%.
Yonge subway reliability has fallen due to ongoing issues with TR train reliability, “workforce availability”, passenger-related delays and fires at track level.
There has been no update on problems with the TRs beyond “we’re working on it”, and the time is overdue to ask whether the goals for reliability have been set too high. Without a detailed report on the situation, there is no way to know whether the trains have chronic, difficult-to-solve problems, or if we can expect some resolution. (According to minutes of an Advisory Committee on Accessible Transit meeting (ACAT), TTC staff have no prognosis for correction of the TR platform leveling problem that makes trains inaccessible.)
36 of the 70 TR trainsets on order have been accepted for service. This leaves 34 trains still in the pipeline to hit early 2014, although the last 10 of the trains are intended for the Spadina extension that will not open until 2016.
“Workforce availability” is an odd term to use considering that overall attendance rates at the TTC are supposed to be improving. Punctuality is affected by a number of factors including the effect of many small delays, but also by extended times required for some crew changeovers. The TTC needs to sort out which effects are strictly due to staff and which to other factors.
The reliability index for Bloor-Danforth is also dropping, but still runs at a higher level than the Yonge-University-Spadina line. The TTC does not break out the various sources of delay by line to report which problems exist system wide and which are more prevalent in certain locations.
SRT performance has been quite good since October 2012 when schedules were changed to reflect the actual capabilities of the aging technology.
Surface route performance for both modes is above the rather generous target levels, but we know from the Quarterly Report published earlier in 2013 that overall headway adherence is quite bad on some routes. This is no surprise to anyone who looks at vehicle monitoring data.
Elevator and escalator availability continues to get a high rating, although, as I understand things, this is based on a once-a-day report of status. There is no report of the prevalence of outages or their duration. This is rather like looking out the window, seeing one bus, and deciding that all is well with the transit system.
A few new Sunday shutdowns of the subway have been announced in this report:
- June 29 from Wilson to Downsview for track installation.
- July 7, 14 and 28 for beam installation on the Prince Edward Viaduct. This work is normally done during the night-time shutdown, but a provision for opening the subway later than normal gives more time to complete planned work.
Details will be announced for each planned shutdown.
Change Orders for Design Costs on the Spadina Extension
Four reports requested substantial changes in the contracts for design work at Steeles West, Vaughan Corporate Centre, Highway 407 and York University stations. The magnitude of the changes attracted questions from the Board.
According to staff, TTC practice is to award design contracts based on interim amounts with change orders issued along the way as required. A contingency budget line provides funding for these changes. Some of the costs will be recovered from third parties such as York Region and GO Transit/Metrolinx who asked for design changes in the originally completed plans. Other costs were incurred to reduce construction expenses and keep stations within the project’s budget. The degree to which this may have compromised the original designs is unknown.
Oddly, some of the extra costs cited by staff were for activities at Finch West and the new Downsview/Sheppard West stations (changes to suit GO and the Finch West LRT project). Neither of these was the subject of the four reports on the agenda.
CEO Andy Byford wants to improve the reporting of large project budgets and costs, but does not expect to have a proposed scheme for doing so until fall 2013.
The Board approved the proposed extension of the 353 Steeles East route from Middlefield Road to Markham Road effective August 4, 2013. This extension uses up excess running time in the current schedule and requires no extra buses.
Ossington Bus / Hellenic Home for the Aged
The TTC has been requested to divert the 63 Ossington bus to a home for the aged which is north of Davenport up a steep hill on which seniors have difficulty walking to service on the main street (see map in report). A decision on the matter has been put off to July 24 to allow for meetings between staff and those requesting the change.
The staff report recommends against this diversion which was requested through Councillors Mihevc and Fragedakis. Mihevc should know better as a former member of the TTC Board. Off-route diversions are the bane of transit operations and compromise the benefit of straight routes for passengers.
It is worth mention that this home was built off of the Ossington route some decades ago, but long after the route was established. The policy decision is whether transit routes should be tweaked to serve such sites, and whether the Board has the political backbone to say “no” when the greater good of the route and the precedent for future requests are at stake.
The property at which the Rogers Road car, originally part of York Township Railways, ended has been declared surplus to TTC requirements. Buses on this route use the nearby Avon Loop on Weston Road.
TTC Low Floor LRV Roll Out Plan Released (Update 3)
Updated June 25, 2013: At the June 24 Commission meeting, CEO Andy Byford presented further details of the roll out plan. This information is added to the end of the article along with additional information I received from TTC staff.
Updated June 23, 2013: A section has been added at the end of the article discussing service levels and fleet planning during the transition from CLRV to LFLRV operation on routes.
The TTC has released its roll out plan for the new fleet of low floor light rail vehicles.
The TTC proposes to increase capacity on all routes during peak periods, although by varying amounts. Off peak headways will be almost unchanged with an effective doubling of capacity on all routes using the 50-foot CLRVs, and a 1/3 improvement on routes with the 75-foot ALRVs. As a general policy, this is a very good start because it avoids replacing capacity-for-capacity with concurrent widening of headways and degradation of service.
The new service levels are shown on the presentation at pages 7-8, and the changes in peak period capacity are summarized in the following table.
The amount of added capacity varies by route and between the AM and PM peak periods. This is supposed to represent the TTC’s estimate of provision for unmet demand although some numbers are a bit hard to believe.
Oddly enough, by the time the new fleet is in place, all of it has been used up serving existing routes (with a 20% allowance for spares).
Off peak services are almost unchanged with the odd effect that there is better planned midday and evening service on some routes than in the peak periods. The TTC claims that the off-peak levels are set based on a minimum headway policy. However, it does not make sense to cut service during the peak period. This seems more the product of two separate plans drawn up without cross-reference to each other than the outcome of careful planning.
King Street: Twenty Years of No Transit Priority
Today, the Toronto Transit Commission passed a motion asking for a report on reserved lanes for King Street. Yes, you read that correctly: this is a street that, in theory, has had peak period transit lanes since 1993.
Here is the motion moved by Chair Karen Stintz and seconded by Commissioner John Parker:
1. That the Board request the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee to direct Transportation Services to prepare a joint City-TTC report on the feasibility and merits of implementing morning rush hour reserved streetcar lanes on King Street, including details pertaining to extent/boundaries of the lanes, means of designation or separation of the lanes, means of enforcement, means of monitoring effectiveness of the lanes, cost of implementing such lanes, and effects on other traffic in the corridor, as well as study of traffic management measures to mitigate delays at other pinch-points on the King Street route. The report should also include recommendations for a trial implementation of such lanes, including the earliest practical date for undertaking such a trial. If appropriate, this reporting-back could be contained within the forthcoming Downtown Transportation Operations Study. (From Chair Stintz’ blog.)
This is a substantial step back from a desire to ban cars completely on King, a proposal with which Stintz appeared to agree, at least for a Pan Am Games trial period in 2015, in the media [CBC Star]. The pre-amalgamation Toronto Council implemented peak period transit lanes on King from Parliament to Dufferin in 1993, but these were a complete failure thanks to lack of enforcement. The downtown section, from John to Jarvis, was removed in 1997. Stintz’ position on timing has changed also with a shift from the Pan Am Games to the “earliest practical date”.
In March 2000, TTC staff reported on “Operational Improvements on 504 King Streetcar” [this report is not available online]. Among the actions taken or under investigation were:
- Adding a second on-street Route Supervisor “to manage the line and obtain better schedule adherence”.
- Use of rear-door loaders at major stops to reduce dwell time.
- Expansion of Proof-of-Payment to the 504 route possibly including reassignment of the ALRVs from Queen to King Street, or the use of coupled CLRVs (this was not implemented).
- Improved enforcement of parking regulations (occasional blitzes have taken place, but nothing lasting).
- Restoration of the reserved lanes between Jarvis and John including overhead signs such as those used for the reversing lane on Jarvis. “Staff believe that the lanes can be made to work effectively, but this will require the lanes to be much more clearly marked and vigourously enforced.” (This was not implemented.)
- Continued enforcement of turn restrictions and of the exclusive nature of the streetcar lanes. (Almost non existent.)
- Further assessment of problem locations. (Judging by actions to date, little has been done beyond a study.)
This is not a new problem. What is very old is a lack of political will to do anything about the situation.
Simply reserving the streetcar lanes during any period of the day is unworkable if the curb lanes are not guaranteed to be free of taxi stands, parking and loading, not to mention construction occupancy arrangements for new condos. The effect on King will differ between the financial district (east of Yonge to Simcoe) and the entertainment district (Simcoe to west of Spadina), not to mention the Bathurst/Niagara condo district (Spadina to Shaw). A one-size-fits-all configuration is unlikely to work or be acceptable.
As a four lane street, and with only a temporary reservation, physical barriers are impractical. Traffic must be free to move between lanes both when the reservation is not active, and when a curb lane blockage requires movement into the streetcar lane.
I have already written about the limited benefit an AM peak reservation will have even if it is well-enforced. Running times on the 504 King car show little sign of traffic congestion until around 9:00 am when parking is allowed and commercial activity begins on the street. If the TTC were serious about “fixing” King Street, they would look at the issue on an all-day basis, but that’s not what the Stintz motion does. She goes for the least controversial option while still attempting to give the impression of doing something for the riders.
(For more of the history on previous King Street and transit priority schemes, please see Transit Toronto and a 2001 TTC report.)
The most disheartening part of the debate at the Commission Meeting was that nobody in the room, no other Commissioners, none of Management, piped up to say “but we already have a reserved lane on part of King, and used to have more”. This is all treated as if it is a brand new idea, not a 20-year old retread from the days when Jack Layton was a City Councillor.
Was everyone too embarrassed? Was it an attack of Emperor’s-New-Clothes syndrome?
TTC meetings are turning into friendly gatherings where good news is the order of the day. There’s nothing wrong with good news, but some decisions involve difficult choices and political battles. You can’t be an advocate for the good of transit riders and expect everything to be smooth, quiet sailing, especially with an administration so hard set against anything but subways we cannot afford.
The whole matter will now wander through the City’s committee structure, first to Public Works and Infrastructure from which it might not emerge given the Mayor’s anti-streetcar rhetoric. Will Chair Stintz ensure that even this modest study proposal survives, or is this an empty motion showing concern without action?
Steve Munro 