After that long post on the TTC’s capital budget woes, I promised that I would write a “what should we do now” post. Here it is.
There are some hard truths that everyone needs to accept about our present situation: Continue reading
After that long post on the TTC’s capital budget woes, I promised that I would write a “what should we do now” post. Here it is.
There are some hard truths that everyone needs to accept about our present situation: Continue reading
In between many screenings at the Film Festival, I took the opportunity to write up the TTC’s Capital Budget presentation from August 30. The information here is a combination of the TTC staff presentation, remarks by Ted Tyndorf, Chief Planner for Toronto, and my own opinions. This is intended mainly as a view of the most recent TTC thoughts on the subject.
Here are the high points:
I will take up the issue of where we should go next with transit planning in a future post, likely over the weekend. Meanwhile, the gory details. Continue reading
The Final Report of the Scarborough RT Strategic Plan came up for discussion nearly at the end of a very long Commission meeting on August 30. This was preceded by a long presentation on the Capital Budget, approval of the Bombardier subway car order and a moving deputation by the wives of two workmen seriously injured by on-the-job carbon monoxide poisoning. Lengthy debate was unlikely. Continue reading
The following is the text of the deputation I will be presenting on August 30 at the TTC meeting. Note that the length and complexity are dictated by the context of public deputations with a finite limit on both time and attention by the Commission.
The text of this presentation has been edited to indicate changes made when it was delivered.
The SRT study is to be considered at the TTC meeting on August 30. There are three documents in all:
I am not going to attempt to duplicate this material here and recommend that readers review the documents for detailed background to this issue. Continue reading
Moments ago on the CBC, I listened to Councillor and TTC Commissioner Glenn De Baeremaeker talking about where transit should be going in Scarborough. Next week, the Scarborough caucus of Toronto Council will ask the TTC to adopt a plan to build a network of streetcar lines in Scarborough rather than simply replacing the RT line’s existing equipment.
Reading between the lines of De Baeremaeker’s comments, TTC staff are recommending the lowest-cost option — new RT cars — rather than conversion to LRT as the basis for a Scarborough network.
Clearly, Scarborough Councillors want a network that will improve service throughout the east end of Toronto. This is a big change from their former position asking for a subway replacement for the RT. The contrast with the situation on the Spadina extension through York University to Vaughan is quite amazing.
In today’s Star, we learn that Vaughan’s Mayor Di Biase is confident that Ottawa will fund the subway as well as bus-only lanes and LRT in York Region. Just imagine how much more LRT we could build if we didn’t insist on tthat $2-billion subway extension.
The tide may finally be turning for LRT in Scarborough, and I hope that the TTC will embrace this proposal. Let’s see how much an LRT network would cost, what sort of service it can provide and how soon we can build it.
This is the third and final installment of a commentary on many articles that appeared in other media over the past months on transit subjects. You can read part 1 here and part 2 here.
On July 23, the Star ran a long article by Paul Bedford, former Chief Planner of the City of Toronto, entitled We Want Change. Bedford poured over hundreds of emails from Star readers and found that the electorate is far ahead of politicians in what they want and will accept to fix the problems of our city, including its transportation system. One vital finding is that people don’t object to paying taxes provided that they actually see some return, some improvement in the services they use and depend on. Politicians with a slavish devotion to lowering taxes, no matter what the cost, should take note. Continue reading
Mike Gordon sent me a link to a recent piece on BBC Newsnight called Where the car is not king. It has a short print version and a 14-minute video extolling the virtues of transit and urban planning as practiced in Portland, Oregon.
The amazing part about this piece is the “reporter” — Sayeeda Warsi who is the vice-chair of the Conservative Party, those folks who will take over whenever Labour manages to lose an election in the UK.
One intriguing reference that isn’t fully explained deals with “public-private partnerships”. Over here, the 3P approach usually means that the public pays for an asset, the private sector is subsidised to run it, and they may even get to keep it. In Portland, the partnership works like this: the public sector builds the transit infrastructure and expects the private sector to build development in a form that supports a transit-bike-pedestrian-skateboard lifestyle. The public infrastructure creates the environment in which the private sector can build saleable developments.
The print version of the article is here and you can link from there to the video. This was posted on August 15.
[This post continues a thread started last week on the re-emergence of transit as a major political issue. For part 1 of this item, click here.]
What To Do About Sprawl?
The Province of Ontario intends in its Places to Grow report that suburbs will develop in a form that can better sustain public transit and reduce our dependence on the automobile. This idea is hardly new, and people have been talking about transit-oriented development for decades. One major problem is that all that talk had no effect on what was actually built. Continue reading
Over the past month or so, we have seen many articles in the Star and Globe about transit, transportation and planning especially for the suburbs. This is the first of a series of posts on these topics.
For part 2, click here.