Service Improvements That Aren’t

Today, May 12, the TTC implemented many changes to its services as detailed in my previous article.

Earlier in the week, on May 7, the Mayor Chow and TTC Chair Myers, among others, held a press conference to announce widespread service improvements, and the illustration below has appear in the Mayor’s social media feeds.

There is only one problem: several of the routes on this map will see service cuts, not increases. In some cases, there is a service increase, but on only part of a route or at a limited time through the week. The chart below illustrates where and when the changes actually happen.

In parliamentary language, one might say that “the Mayor was badly advised”. However, it is her name and face on an announcement that simply is not true.

TTC management has a long history of spinning service changes to emphasize the gains, such as they might be, while downplaying the cuts. The May 2024 changes were particularly challenging to anyone who wanted the details because the memo containing this information was not released until the afternoon of May 10. Normally it is available one to two weeks in advance. It may have suited the stage management of the press conference to keep it under wraps.

995 York Mills Express was singled out in the press announcement because of the doubling of weekday midday service from 20′ to 10′, but that is a rare example of a significant improvement. It is not typical of the actual changes to the bus network as a whole.

I have already written about the so-called service recovery based on vehicle hours, not on actual service frequency. The TTC itself has noted a decline in traffic and transit speeds in recent years. That, combined with more generous provisions for delay recovery time has pushed up the number of hours even while some routes see less frequent service.

This chart and the following text have been corrected to show changes to 939 Finch East Express which were missed in the first version.

A detailed route-by-route review follows the “more” break.

Routes Included in the “Service Increase” Map

19 Bay: The south end of this route serving the waterfront has been lopped off as 114 Queens Quay. This change should insulate the main route from effects of traffic congestion on Bay and on Queens Quay. The route is a shadow of its former self, and has very infrequent service in spite of having an HOV diamond lane. With the change in route length, service frequencies are modified. In many cases, scheduled service will be even more infrequent, notably on weekdays, than it was before. At no time does this route operate frequent service.

25 Don Mills: The only change on this route is the restoration of 10′ headways in the late evening period.

36 Finch West: PM peak service between Yonge and Finch West Station is more frequent at the peak and reduced in the early evening. West of Finch West Station, the Milvan branches run slightly less frequently. The major change is that much of the extra running time and buses added to compensate for Line 6 construction have been removed, but there is no change in scheduled frequencies.

935 Jane Express: Weekday early evening service has been restored.

38/938 Highland Creek: The usual summer service change consolidates the local and express services and reduces frequencies. This change is typically reversed in September.

39 Finch East: Early morning and late evening service is improved on Saturdays.

939 Finch East Express: Service is improved in weekday peak periods and midday, and on Saturday afternoon.

44 Kipling South: Service is improved in the weekday midday and PM peak.

46 Martin Grove: Schedules are adjusted for “reliability” with the extension of running times on weekends. Service will be less frequent in all periods except late evening.

53 Steeles East: The only change is that service is more frequent on Saturday afternoons.

57 Midland: Service is increased during weekday peak periods and midday.

60 Steeles West: Service is increased during weekday peak periods.

68 Warden: Service is increase weekday middays and Saturday afternoons.

72 Pape (and 81 Thorncliffe Park): These routes have been amalgamated as one service because Pape Station Loop will be closed for six months. Service on the consolidated route, both north and south of Danforth, is generally more frequent, with a few exceptions to the south mainly in the early morning and late evening.

76 Royal York South: Service improved weekday midday and late evening.

92 Woodbine South: Weekend service improved for added summer traffic to The Beach. Weekday service will run less often to provide additional running time.

95 York Mills: Service improved during most weekend periods and weekday evenings. Express service improved weekday peak periods and midday.

102/902 Markham Road: 102A local service to Centennial College suspended for the summer. Express service will run less frequently but will use articulated buses for a net addition to capacity.

104/184 Faywood/Ancaster Park: These routes are interlined and share a common schedule. Running times have been adjusted with a mix of more and less frequent service depending on the period.

111 East Mall: Improved PM peak service.

114 Queens Quay: New route replacing the south end of 19 Bay and the west end of 72B Pape. Scheduled service is more frequent on weekdays and some weekend periods.

123 Sherway: Service during most weekend periods will be less frequent due to running time changes.

Other Routes (Seasonal and Construction Changes)

8 Broadview & 62 Mortimer: As part of the route shuffle for the Pape Station closing, these routes are extended south on Broadview to Gerrard. The headway changes are an effect of the longer route, and they will shift back when the normal routes are restored in the fall.

903 STC Express: Service is modified for the summer with less weekday service running through to Centennial College, and all service east of STC suspended on weekends.

927 Highway 27 Express: Peak period trippers to Humber College are suspended for the summer.

A Note About Service Reliability

When the TTC widens headways to provide more running time for buses, they often argue that this will improve service because operators will be better able to stay on time. In effect, they claim that the service is already bad and they are adjusting schedules to match the real world.

(For example, a route that operated every 20 minutes with three buses would have a one hour round trip time. If the headway changes to 25 minutes, the round trip is now 75 minutes rather than 60. The same number of bus and operator hours are scheduled, but riders see less frequent service.)

Unfortunately, regular service is not the TTC’s strong suit. A related problem is that uneven service leads to higher loads on buses in wider gaps, and for routes that already have infrequent service, these gaps can be very wide indeed.

Either way, saying that service is “increasing” on such routes is simply not true.

12 thoughts on “Service Improvements That Aren’t

  1. Even the term “service reliability” is a questionable term for the TTC.

    There are some routes which the wider headway is also impacting drivers which lead to the service level to be “broken”.

    Last July, 50 Burnhamthorpe had it’s service level chopped and lost a bus during the each peak hour. However, the headway and the number of bus is the same for the daytime and the pm rush.

    I think the route was designed to be 15 minute driving time and 5 minute recovery time on each ends (Islington Station and Mill Road loop). However, that is impossible during the PM rush since there are often more traffic and more stops are being made to pick up and drop off customers..

    And the driver is still taking long breaks even if the running time reaches close to 20 minute or exceed it. So this means the rider could wait more than the indicated headway for the buses..

    I swear there are bunch of routes like this where both headway and driving time design is broken.

    Like

  2. Thank you for such a quick and detailed analysis which shows how the Mayor and TTC are overselling TTC improvements when clearly that is not the case.

    Like

  3. Politicians and big heads at the TTC must hate you! You’re a “truth sayer” Steve. Now, normally that’s not a dirty word, not a bad thing to be called. But in this case, have you any body guards?!!! Someone might want to stuff a sock in your mouth!

    I’m really grateful to be hearing the reality spoken – or written. I’m so tired of hearing how great things are when they aren’t. Thanks for your work.

    Like


  4. figures lie and liars figure….


    or something like that


    I am waiting for a response for last September from the TTC – ask and “we are working on it, departments aren’t getting back to us”

    Like

  5. No matter how much infrastructure and service improvements are provided, Steve is always criticising and complaining. It is not possible to satisfy Steve, some people will always complain.

    Steve: Some people never read the article or understand its purpose. Many service “improvements” were claimed, but what was actually provided were cuts. False advertising is the most polite term I can use for this. BTW, when a mistake occurs here, I acknowledge and fix it as quickly as possible.

    Like

  6. Ridership numbers don’t warrant increased frequency.

    Steve: Tell that to riders who are packed into buses.

    Like

  7. At one point, Chow needs to be held accountable for being bamboozled by TTC management yet again…

    How does that old saying go again?

    Fool me once, shame on you, fool me thrice, shame on me?

    Like

  8. Its a shame that the Martin Grove bus will be cut, once again. It gets very packed and congested, so having a service cut will just make the dilapidated route even worse.

    Do you know if bus service will be shuffled once Eglinton Crosstown, and the Finch LRT open? I’d assume that with the 32, 34, and 36 being freed up, maybe it’ll bring forth better service within Suburban Toronto.

    Thanks Steve, for everything that you do. I hope you had a wonderful weekend.

    Steve: The TTC has published maps of the route revisions when Lines 5 and 6 open, but nothing about service levels. Don’t make any assumptions about redeployed buses. And, yes, I had a wonderful weekend! Thanks!

    Like

  9. As an operator that sees time from one end to the other end get shortened and end breaks disappear and not extra buses added to the route, it would be nice if they explained that when they call it a “service improvement”.

    This doesn’t make us drive faster, it actually makes up give up trying.

    Like

  10. Cutting the run time while keeping the number of buses the same, which is what they mostly did, is not a service improvement. Speed limits haven’t changed and the city hasn’t shrunk.

    Steve: Actually if you look through the spreadsheet showing the detailed changes, in most cases the running times are longer except on Finch West where extra time for Line 6 construction has been removed.

    Like

  11. “However, it is her name and face on an announcement that simply is not true.”

    WAITTAMINITE! I thought you were in the tank for Mayor Chow????

    In fairness, was this something typed up by the lackeys at TTC who then slapped her name/image on the announcement?

    Given the recent history of that once fine street railway co, I would think that this was within the realm of the possible …

    Steve: I am sure that the TTC produced the map, but it was Mayor Chow’s office that published it to her social media feeds. The story that service was “increased” on all of these routes is not true. “Adjusted” yes, but “increased” no. Also some of the changes are small and of limited scope certainly not warranting a press conference.

    Of course I am a Chow supporter, but that does not make me beholden to her. Some collection of people at the TTC and City Hall decided that this was how to spin the story, and she gets to wear the effect when riders see what is really happening.

    Liked by 3 people

  12. Steve: Of course I am a Chow supporter

    But you publicly endorsed and voted for Matlow who finished last with less than one percent of the votes, sounds like your endorsement is not worth the paper it’s written on.

    Steve: You dumb as a plank troll: yes I supported Matlow, but Chow won and I support her over the gang of John Tory hangers-on who might have become mayor. Also if you check the results, you will see that Matlow came 5th with 35,572 votes. Disappointing, but much higher than “less than one percent”.

    Like

Comments are closed.